Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT765C vs Ford 946

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT765C

Crawler

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765C specs
Ford 946 Tractor
FordModel B

Ford 946

Agricultural

power
325 hp
displacement
855 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
12
Full 946 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT765C
vs
FordFord 946

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

▲ 946 higher · +4 hp (+1%)
MT765C321 hp
946325 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT765C is in the 95th percentile; 946 is in the 95th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 946 higher · +318 ci (+59%)
MT765C537 ci
946855 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT765C is in the 89th percentile; 946 is in the 97th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT765C6
9466
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT765C is in the 74th percentile; 946 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT765C higher · +4 (+33%)
MT765C16
94612
Median Agricultural Tractor16

MT765C is in the 50th percentile; 946 is in the 33rd · 972 models

MT765C (A)946 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT765CFord 946Difference
ManufacturerChallengerFord—
ModelMT765C946—
CategoryCrawler, AgriculturalAgricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT765CFord 946Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCummins—
ModelC9 ACERTNTA-855-A325—
Power Output321hp325hp▲ 946+4 hp · +1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement537ci855ci▲ 946+318 ci · +59%
Bore4.4in5.5in▲ 946+1.1 in · +25%
Stroke5.9in6in▲ 946+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT765CFord 946Difference
Type16-Speed Full Power ShiftFull Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT765CFord 946Difference
Length233in260in▲ 946+27 in · +12%
Width133inNot recorded—
Height136in131in▲ MT765C+5 in · +4%
Operating Weight31,085lb32,500lb▲ 946+1,415 lb · +5%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT765CFord 946Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedClosed Center Load Sensing—
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT765CFord 946Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedIII/IVN—
Hitch CategoryCategory III/IIINCategory 3—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT765CFord 946Difference
Chassis TypeCrawlerNot recorded—
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelNot recorded—
Brake TypeHydraulic Wet DiscNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT765CFord 946Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT765CFord 946Difference
CoolantNot recorded15.9gal—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT765CFord 946Difference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 95th percentile (321 hp)B · 95th percentile (325 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 97th percentile (855 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 33rd percentile (12)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 95th percentile (31,085 lb)B · 96th percentile (32,500 lb)
A · MT765CB · 946Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT765CFull spec pageFord 946