Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT855C vs Challenger MT965C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT855C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
475 hp
displacement
923 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT855C specs
Challenger MT965C Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT965C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
525 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT965C specs
ChallengerChallenger MT855C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT965C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 71–162

Engine Power

▲ MT965C higher · +50 hp (+11%)
MT855C475 hp
MT965C525 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT855C is in the 71st percentile; MT965C is in the 80th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT965C higher · +182 ci (+20%)
MT855C923 ci
MT965C1,105 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT855C is in the 83rd percentile; MT965C is in the 91st · 152 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT855C6
MT965C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

MT855C is in the 50th percentile; MT965C is in the 50th · 159 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT855C16
MT965C16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

MT855C is in the 50th percentile; MT965C is in the 50th · 146 models

MT855C (A)MT965C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT855CMT965C—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965CDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelC15 ACERTC18 ACERT—
Power Output475hp525hp▲ MT965C+50 hp · +11%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement923ci1,105ci▲ MT965C+182 ci · +20%
Bore5.4in5.7in▲ MT965C+0.3 in · +6%
Stroke6.8in7.2in▲ MT965C+0.4 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965CDifference
TypeFull power shiftCaterpillar Powershift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965CDifference
Length270in298in▲ MT965C+28 in · +10%
Width142in200in▲ MT965C+58 in · +41%
Height138in151in▲ MT965C+13 in · +9%
Operating Weight41,000lb50,890lb▲ MT965C+9,890 lb · +24%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965CDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedClosed Center Pressure Flow Compensated—
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965CDifference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded520/85R46—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded520/85R46—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965CDifference
Hitch CategoryIII/IVNIII/IVNSame
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965CDifference
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discsNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965CDifference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 71st percentile (475 hp)B · 80th percentile (525 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 83rd percentile (923 ci)B · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 61st percentile (41,000 lb)B · 90th percentile (50,890 lb)
A · MT855CB · MT965CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT855CFull spec pageChallenger MT965C