Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT855C vs Challenger MT965E

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT855C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
475 hp
displacement
923 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT855C specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT965E

Agricultural

power
550 hp
displacement
1,025 ci
Cylinders
12
Forward gears
16
Full MT965E specs
ChallengerChallenger MT855C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT965E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 132–162

Engine Power

▲ MT965E higher · +75 hp (+16%)
MT855C475 hp
MT965E550 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT855C is in the 71st percentile; MT965E is in the 85th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT965E higher · +102 ci (+11%)
MT855C923 ci
MT965E1,025 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT855C is in the 83rd percentile; MT965E is in the 87th · 152 models

Cylinders

▲ MT965E higher · +6 (+100%)
MT855C6
MT965E12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

MT855C is in the 50th percentile; MT965E is in the 99th · 159 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT855C16
MT965E16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

MT855C is in the 50th percentile; MT965E is in the 50th · 146 models

MT855C (A)MT965E (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965EDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT855CMT965E—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveAgricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965EDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarAGCO Power—
ModelC15 ACERTTurbocharged Diesel—
Power Output475hp550hp▲ MT965E+75 hp · +16%
Rated RPM2,100RPM1,900RPM▲ MT855C+200 RPM · +11%
Cylinders612▲ MT965E+6 · +100%
Displacement923ci1,025ci▲ MT965E+102 ci · +11%
Bore5.4inNot recorded—
Stroke6.8inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965EDifference
TypeFull power shiftPower Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965EDifference
Length270inNot recorded—
Width142inNot recorded—
Height138inNot recorded—
Operating Weight41,000lb47,500lb▲ MT965E+6,500 lb · +16%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965EDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedClosed center pressure-flow compensatedSame
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965EDifference
Hitch CategoryIII/IVNNot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965EDifference
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discsNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965EDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT855CChallenger MT965EDifference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 71st percentile (475 hp)B · 85th percentile (550 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 83rd percentile (923 ci)B · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 61st percentile (41,000 lb)B · 84th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · MT855CB · MT965EMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT855CFull spec pageChallenger MT965E