Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT965E vs Challenger MT975C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT965E

Agricultural

power
550 hp
displacement
1,025 ci
Cylinders
12
Forward gears
16
Full MT965E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT975C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
585 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT975C specs
ChallengerChallenger MT965E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 971–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT975C higher · +35 hp (+6%)
MT965E550 hp
MT975C585 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT965E is in the 99th percentile; MT975C is in the 99th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT975C higher · +80 ci (+8%)
MT965E1,025 ci
MT975C1,105 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT965E is in the 98th percentile; MT975C is in the 99th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ MT965E higher · +6 (+100%)
MT965E12
MT975C6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT965E is in the 99th percentile; MT975C is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT965E16
MT975C16
Median Agricultural Tractor16

MT965E is in the 50th percentile; MT975C is in the 50th · 972 models

MT965E (A)MT975C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT965EChallenger MT975CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT965EMT975C—
CategoryAgriculturalFour-Wheel Drive—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT965EChallenger MT975CDifference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerCaterpillar—
ModelTurbocharged DieselC18 ACERT—
Power Output550hp585hp▲ MT975C+35 hp · +6%
Rated RPM1,900RPM2,100RPM▲ MT975C+200 RPM · +11%
Cylinders126▲ MT965E+6 · +100%
Displacement1,025ci1,105ci▲ MT975C+80 ci · +8%
BoreNot recorded5.7in—
StrokeNot recorded7.2in—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT965EChallenger MT975CDifference
TypePower ShiftCaterpillar Powershift, full power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT965EChallenger MT975CDifference
LengthNot recorded298in—
WidthNot recorded200in—
HeightNot recorded151in—
Operating Weight47,500lb50,535lb▲ MT975C+3,035 lb · +6%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT965EChallenger MT975CDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedDirect engine drive—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT965EChallenger MT975CDifference
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT965EChallenger MT975CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT965EChallenger MT975CDifference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 99th percentile (550 hp)B · 99th percentile (585 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 98th percentile (1,025 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 99th percentile (12)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 99th percentile (47,500 lb)B · 99th percentile (50,535 lb)
A · MT965EB · MT975CMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT965EFull spec pageChallenger MT975C