ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT862
Agricultural
- power
- 610 hp
- displacement
- 934 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT862 vs John Deere 9R 640
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9R 640
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 632 hp
- displacement
- 827 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger MT862
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9R 640
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 9R 640 higher · +22 hp (+4%)MT862610 hp
9R 640632 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT862 is in the 99th percentile; 9R 640 is in the 99th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT862 higher · +107 ci (+13%)MT862934 ci
9R 640827 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT862 is in the 98th percentile; 9R 640 is in the 96th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT8626
9R 6406
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT862 is in the 74th percentile; 9R 640 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9R 640 higher · +4,680 lb (+11%)MT86242,000 lb
9R 64046,680 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT862 is in the 98th percentile; 9R 640 is in the 99th · 971 models
MT862 (A)9R 640 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | John Deere 9R 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT862 | 9R 640 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | John Deere 9R 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | John Deere | — |
| Model | D3876 | JD14 | — |
| Power Output | 610hp | 632hp | ▲ 9R 640+22 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 1,730RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 9R 640+370 RPM · +21% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 934ci | 827ci | ▲ MT862+107 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 5.2in | ▲ MT862+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 6.7in | 6.5in | ▲ MT862+0.2 in · +3% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | John Deere 9R 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-variable transmission | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | John Deere 9R 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 266in | 313in | ▲ 9R 640+47 in · +18% |
| Width | 116in | 173in | ▲ 9R 640+57 in · +49% |
| Height | 148in | 147in | ▲ MT862+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 42,000lb | 46,680lb | ▲ 9R 640+4,680 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | John Deere 9R 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | Closed center pressure/flow compensated | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | John Deere 9R 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IV/IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | John Deere 9R 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | John Deere 9R 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | John Deere 9R 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 14.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | John Deere 9R 640 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 99th percentile (610 hp)B · 99th percentile (632 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 98th percentile (934 ci)B · 96th percentile (827 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 98th percentile (42,000 lb)B · 99th percentile (46,680 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 99th percentile (266 in)B · 99th percentile (313 in)
A · MT862B · 9R 640Median Agricultural Tractor