Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT865
Articulated
- power
- 524 hp
- displacement
- 964 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger MT865 vs Fendt 1159 MT
FendtModel B
Fendt 1159 MT
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 540 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT865
vs
FendtFendt 1159 MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ 1159 MT higher · +16 hp (+3%)MT865524 hp
1159 MT540 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
MT865 is in the 77th percentile; 1159 MT is in the 84th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1159 MT higher · +61 ci (+6%)MT865964 ci
1159 MT1,025 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
MT865 is in the 90th percentile; 1159 MT is in the 91st · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ 1159 MT higher · +6 (+100%)MT8656
1159 MT12
Median Articulated Tractor6
MT865 is in the 50th percentile; 1159 MT is in the 97th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT86516
1159 MT16
Median Articulated Tractor16
MT865 is in the 50th percentile; 1159 MT is in the 50th · 59 models
MT865 (A)1159 MT (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT865 | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT865 | 1159 MT | — |
| Category | Articulated | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT865 | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | C16 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 524hp | 540hp | ▲ 1159 MT+16 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 1,750RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 1159 MT+350 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ 1159 MT+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 964ci | 1,025ci | ▲ 1159 MT+61 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.4in | ▲ MT865+1.1 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 6.7in | 5.7in | ▲ MT865+1 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT865 | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full operator-controlled power shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT865 | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 266in | 266in | Same |
| Width | 142in | 118in | ▲ MT865+24 in · +20% |
| Height | 139in | 136in | ▲ MT865+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 44,220lb | 42,692lb | ▲ MT865+1,528 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT865 | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT865 | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT865 | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT865 | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT865 | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 77th percentile (524 hp)B · 84th percentile (540 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 90th percentile (964 ci)B · 91st percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 97th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 34th percentile (44,220 lb)B · 23rd percentile (42,692 lb)
A · MT865B · 1159 MTMedian Articulated Tractor