Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT855C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 475 hp
- displacement
- 923 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT855C vs Fendt 1159 MT
FendtModel B
Fendt 1159 MT
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 540 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT855C
vs
FendtFendt 1159 MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 1159 MT higher · +65 hp (+14%)MT855C475 hp
1159 MT540 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT855C is in the 71st percentile; 1159 MT is in the 85th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1159 MT higher · +102 ci (+11%)MT855C923 ci
1159 MT1,025 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT855C is in the 83rd percentile; 1159 MT is in the 87th · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ 1159 MT higher · +6 (+100%)MT855C6
1159 MT12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT855C is in the 50th percentile; 1159 MT is in the 99th · 159 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT855C16
1159 MT16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT855C is in the 50th percentile; 1159 MT is in the 50th · 146 models
MT855C (A)1159 MT (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT855C | 1159 MT | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | C15 ACERT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 475hp | 540hp | ▲ 1159 MT+65 hp · +14% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ 1159 MT+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 923ci | 1,025ci | ▲ 1159 MT+102 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 4.4in | ▲ MT855C+1 in · +23% |
| Stroke | 6.8in | 5.7in | ▲ MT855C+1.1 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 270in | 266in | ▲ MT855C+4 in · +2% |
| Width | 142in | 118in | ▲ MT855C+24 in · +20% |
| Height | 138in | 136in | ▲ MT855C+2 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 41,000lb | 42,692lb | ▲ 1159 MT+1,692 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Speed sensitive differential | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Speed sensitive differential | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet discs | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Fendt 1159 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 71st percentile (475 hp)B · 85th percentile (540 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 83rd percentile (923 ci)B · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 61st percentile (41,000 lb)B · 66th percentile (42,692 lb)
A · MT855CB · 1159 MTMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor