Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT865C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 534 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT865C vs Rome 600C
RomeModel B
Rome 600C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 1,150 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT865C
vs
RomeRome 600C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 600C higher · +66 hp (+12%)MT865C534 hp
600C600 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT865C is in the 83rd percentile; 600C is in the 92nd · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 600C higher · +45 ci (+4%)MT865C1,105 ci
600C1,150 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT865C is in the 91st percentile; 600C is in the 96th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT865C6
600C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT865C is in the 50th percentile; 600C is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT865C higher · +4 (+33%)MT865C16
600C12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT865C is in the 50th percentile; 600C is in the 27th · 146 models
MT865C (A)600C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Rome 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Rome | — |
| Model | MT865C | 600C | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Rome 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Cummins | — |
| Model | C18 ACERT | KTA-1150C | — |
| Power Output | 534hp | 600hp | ▲ 600C+66 hp · +12% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 1,105ci | 1,150ci | ▲ 600C+45 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 5.7in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 7.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Rome 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Caterpillar Powershift | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Rome 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 270in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 142in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 138in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 43,125lb | 42,600lb | ▲ MT865C+525 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Rome 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Rome 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Rome 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 Articulated | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT865C | Rome 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 83rd percentile (534 hp)B · 92nd percentile (600 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)B · 96th percentile (1,150 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 68th percentile (43,125 lb)B · 64th percentile (42,600 lb)
A · MT865CB · 600CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor