Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT965B vs Challenger MT975E

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT965B

Four-Wheel Drive

power
510 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT965B specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT975E

Four-Wheel Drive

power
600 hp
displacement
1,025 ci
Cylinders
12
Forward gears
16
Full MT975E specs
ChallengerChallenger MT965B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 132–162

Engine Power

▲ MT975E higher · +90 hp (+18%)
MT965B510 hp
MT975E600 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT965B is in the 77th percentile; MT975E is in the 92nd · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT965B higher · +80 ci (+8%)
MT965B1,105 ci
MT975E1,025 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT965B is in the 91st percentile; MT975E is in the 87th · 152 models

Cylinders

▲ MT975E higher · +6 (+100%)
MT965B6
MT975E12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

MT965B is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 159 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT965B16
MT975E16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

MT965B is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 50th · 146 models

MT965B (A)MT975E (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT965BChallenger MT975EDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT965BMT975E—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT965BChallenger MT975EDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarAGCO Power—
ModelDiesel (Serial No. *EJG01193*)Not recorded—
Power Output510hp600hp▲ MT975E+90 hp · +18%
Rated RPM2,100RPM1,900RPM▲ MT965B+200 RPM · +11%
Cylinders612▲ MT975E+6 · +100%
Displacement1,105ci1,025ci▲ MT965B+80 ci · +8%
Bore5.7inNot recorded—
Stroke7.2inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT965BChallenger MT975EDifference
Typeselective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled powershiftPower Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT965BChallenger MT975EDifference
Length298inNot recorded—
Width200inNot recorded—
Height151inNot recorded—
Operating Weight50,715lb47,500lb▲ MT965B+3,215 lb · +7%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT965BChallenger MT975EDifference
System TypeClosed Center PFCClosed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT965BChallenger MT975EDifference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded42x27.95—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded42x27.95—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT965BChallenger MT975EDifference
Hitch CategoryIVN/III OptNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT965BChallenger MT975EDifference
Brake Typewet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedalNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT965BChallenger MT975EDifference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 77th percentile (510 hp)B · 92nd percentile (600 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)B · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 90th percentile (50,715 lb)B · 84th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · MT965BB · MT975EMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT965BFull spec pageChallenger MT975E