Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT965C vs Challenger MT975E

Challenger MT965C Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT965C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
525 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT965C specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT975E

Four-Wheel Drive

power
600 hp
displacement
1,025 ci
Cylinders
12
Forward gears
16
Full MT975E specs
ChallengerChallenger MT965C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 132–162

Engine Power

▲ MT975E higher · +75 hp (+14%)
MT965C525 hp
MT975E600 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT965C is in the 80th percentile; MT975E is in the 92nd · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT965C higher · +80 ci (+8%)
MT965C1,105 ci
MT975E1,025 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT965C is in the 91st percentile; MT975E is in the 87th · 152 models

Cylinders

▲ MT975E higher · +6 (+100%)
MT965C6
MT975E12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

MT965C is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 159 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT965C16
MT975E16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

MT965C is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 50th · 146 models

MT965C (A)MT975E (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT965CChallenger MT975EDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT965CMT975E—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT965CChallenger MT975EDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarAGCO Power—
ModelC18 ACERTNot recorded—
Power Output525hp600hp▲ MT975E+75 hp · +14%
Rated RPM2,100RPM1,900RPM▲ MT965C+200 RPM · +11%
Cylinders612▲ MT975E+6 · +100%
Displacement1,105ci1,025ci▲ MT965C+80 ci · +8%
Bore5.7inNot recorded—
Stroke7.2inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT965CChallenger MT975EDifference
TypeCaterpillar PowershiftPower Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT965CChallenger MT975EDifference
Length298inNot recorded—
Width200inNot recorded—
Height151inNot recorded—
Operating Weight50,890lb47,500lb▲ MT965C+3,390 lb · +7%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT965CChallenger MT975EDifference
System TypeClosed Center Pressure Flow CompensatedClosed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT965CChallenger MT975EDifference
Front Tire Size520/85R4642x27.95—
Rear Tire Size520/85R4642x27.95—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT965CChallenger MT975EDifference
Hitch CategoryIII/IVNNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT965CChallenger MT975EDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 80th percentile (525 hp)B · 92nd percentile (600 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)B · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 90th percentile (50,890 lb)B · 84th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · MT965CB · MT975EMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT965CFull spec pageChallenger MT975E