ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT965C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 525 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT965C vs New Holland TJ530
New HollandModel B
New Holland TJ530
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 530 hp
- displacement
- 912 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT965C
vs
New HollandNew Holland TJ530
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ TJ530 higher · +5 hp (<1%)MT965C525 hp
TJ530530 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT965C is in the 80th percentile; TJ530 is in the 81st · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT965C higher · +193 ci (+21%)MT965C1,105 ci
TJ530912 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT965C is in the 91st percentile; TJ530 is in the 78th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT965C6
TJ5306
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT965C is in the 50th percentile; TJ530 is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT965C16
TJ53016
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT965C is in the 50th percentile; TJ530 is in the 50th · 146 models
MT965C (A)TJ530 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT965C | New Holland TJ530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | MT965C | TJ530 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT965C | New Holland TJ530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Cummins | — |
| Model | C18 ACERT | QSX15 | — |
| Power Output | 525hp | 530hp | ▲ TJ530+5 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ MT965C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 1,105ci | 912ci | ▲ MT965C+193 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 5.7in | 5.4in | ▲ MT965C+0.3 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 7.2in | 6.7in | ▲ MT965C+0.5 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT965C | New Holland TJ530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Caterpillar Powershift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT965C | New Holland TJ530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 298in | 298in | Same |
| Width | 200in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 151in | 150in | ▲ MT965C+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 50,890lb | 54,000lb | ▲ TJ530+3,110 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT965C | New Holland TJ530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT965C | New Holland TJ530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 520/85R46 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 520/85R46 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT965C | New Holland TJ530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IVN (optional) | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT965C | New Holland TJ530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT965C | New Holland TJ530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT965C | New Holland TJ530 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 21.1gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 80th percentile (525 hp)B · 81st percentile (530 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)B · 78th percentile (912 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 90th percentile (50,890 lb)B · 93rd percentile (54,000 lb)
A · MT965CB · TJ530Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor