Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT975E
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT975E vs Fendt 1165 MT
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 1165 MT
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 590 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT975E
vs
FendtFendt 1165 MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT975E higher · +10 hp (+2%)MT975E600 hp
1165 MT590 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT975E is in the 92nd percentile; 1165 MT is in the 89th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT975E1,025 ci
1165 MT1,025 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT975E is in the 87th percentile; 1165 MT is in the 87th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT975E12
1165 MT12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT975E is in the 99th percentile; 1165 MT is in the 99th · 159 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT975E16
1165 MT16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT975E is in the 50th percentile; 1165 MT is in the 50th · 146 models
MT975E (A)1165 MT (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT975E | 1165 MT | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | AGCO Power | Same |
| Power Output | 600hp | 590hp | ▲ MT975E+10 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 1,900RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 1165 MT+200 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 12 | 12 | Same |
| Displacement | 1,025ci | 1,025ci | Same |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.7in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power Shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 266in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 136in | — |
| Operating Weight | 47,500lb | 42,692lb | ▲ MT975E+4,808 lb · +11% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 42x27.95 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 42x27.95 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IV/III | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 92nd percentile (600 hp)B · 89th percentile (590 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)B · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 99th percentile (12)B · 99th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 84th percentile (47,500 lb)B · 66th percentile (42,692 lb)
A · MT975EB · 1165 MTMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor