Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT975E vs Kirovets K-5280 ATM

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT975E

Four-Wheel Drive

power
600 hp
displacement
1,025 ci
Cylinders
12
Forward gears
16
Full MT975E specs
Image not recorded
KirovetsModel B

Kirovets K-5280 ATM

Row Crop

power
280 hp
displacement
436 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
40
Full K-5280 ATM specs
ChallengerChallenger MT975E
vs
KirovetsKirovets K-5280 ATM

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 132–162

Engine Power

▲ MT975E higher · +320 hp (+114%)
MT975E600 hp
K-5280 ATM280 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT975E is in the 92nd percentile; K-5280 ATM is in the 20th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT975E higher · +589 ci (+135%)
MT975E1,025 ci
K-5280 ATM436 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT975E is in the 87th percentile; K-5280 ATM is in the 4th · 152 models

Cylinders

▲ MT975E higher · +6 (+100%)
MT975E12
K-5280 ATM6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

MT975E is in the 99th percentile; K-5280 ATM is in the 50th · 159 models

Forward Gears

▲ K-5280 ATM higher · +24 (+150%)
MT975E16
K-5280 ATM40
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

MT975E is in the 50th percentile; K-5280 ATM is in the 99th · 146 models

MT975E (A)K-5280 ATM (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT975EKirovets K-5280 ATMDifference
ManufacturerChallengerKirovets—
ModelMT975EK-5280 ATM—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveRow Crop—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT975EKirovets K-5280 ATMDifference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerDeutz—
ModelNot recordedBF6M 1013C—
Power Output600hp280hp▲ MT975E+320 hp · +114%
Rated RPM1,900RPM2,300RPM▲ K-5280 ATM+400 RPM · +21%
Cylinders126▲ MT975E+6 · +100%
Displacement1,025ci436ci▲ MT975E+589 ci · +135%
BoreNot recorded4.3in—
StrokeNot recorded5.1in—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT975EKirovets K-5280 ATMDifference
TypePower ShiftNot recorded—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT975EKirovets K-5280 ATMDifference
LengthNot recorded217in—
WidthNot recorded98.4in—
HeightNot recorded126in—
Operating Weight47,500lb18,080lb▲ MT975E+29,420 lb · +163%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT975EKirovets K-5280 ATMDifference
System TypeClosed Center Pressure-Flow CompensatedNot recorded—
Steering TypeNot recordedPower—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT975EKirovets K-5280 ATMDifference
Front Tire Size42x27.95Not recorded—
Rear Tire Size42x27.95Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT975EKirovets K-5280 ATMDifference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT975EKirovets K-5280 ATMDifference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD—
Steering TypeNot recordedPower—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT975EKirovets K-5280 ATMDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT975EKirovets K-5280 ATMDifference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 92nd percentile (600 hp)B · 20th percentile (280 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)B · 4th percentile (436 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 99th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 99th percentile (40)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 84th percentile (47,500 lb)B · 7th percentile (18,080 lb)
A · MT975EB · K-5280 ATMMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT975EFull spec pageKirovets K-5280 ATM