Image not recorded
ChamberlainModel A
Chamberlain Champion 6G
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 270 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Chamberlain Champion 6G vs Ford 6610 Mark III
FordModel B
Ford 6610 Mark III
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ChamberlainChamberlain Champion 6G
vs
FordFord 6610 Mark III
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ Champion 6G higher · +2 ci (<1%)Champion 6G270 ci
6610 Mark III268 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Champion 6G is in the 78th percentile; 6610 Mark III is in the 75th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedChampion 6G4
6610 Mark III4
Median Utility Tractor4
Champion 6G is in the 50th percentile; 6610 Mark III is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6610 Mark III higher · +10 (+167%)Champion 6G6
6610 Mark III16
Median Utility Tractor12
Champion 6G is in the 11th percentile; 6610 Mark III is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ Champion 6G higher · +20 lb (<1%)Champion 6G7,300 lb
6610 Mark III7,280 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Champion 6G is in the 69th percentile; 6610 Mark III is in the 69th · 5,107 models
Champion 6G (A)6610 Mark III (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Chamberlain Champion 6G | Ford 6610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Chamberlain | Ford | — |
| Model | Champion 6G | 6610 Mark III | — |
| Category | Utility, Standard Tread | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Chamberlain Champion 6G | Ford 6610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Ford | — |
| Model | L4 | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,070RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 270ci | 268ci | ▲ Champion 6G+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ 6610 Mark III+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ Champion 6G+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Chamberlain Champion 6G | Ford 6610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Dual Power | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Chamberlain Champion 6G | Ford 6610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 152in | 145in | ▲ Champion 6G+7 in · +5% |
| Width | 85in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 69in | 110in | ▲ 6610 Mark III+41 in · +59% |
| Operating Weight | 7,300lb | 7,280lb | ▲ Champion 6G+20 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Chamberlain Champion 6G | Ford 6610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center with closed-center valves | — |
| Steering Type | Mechanical - Recirculating Ball | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Chamberlain Champion 6G | Ford 6610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Chamberlain Champion 6G | Ford 6610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Mechanical - Recirculating Ball | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Chamberlain Champion 6G | Ford 6610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Chamberlain Champion 6G | Ford 6610 Mark III | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 78th percentile (270 ci)B · 75th percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 69th percentile (7,300 lb)B · 69th percentile (7,280 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 68th percentile (152 in)B · 61st percentile (145 in)
A · Champion 6GB · 6610 Mark IIIMedian Utility Tractor