Head to head · Agricultural

Claas Atles 926 vs Claas Challenger 35

Image not recorded
ClaasModel A

Claas Atles 926

Agricultural

power
232 hp
displacement
436 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Atles 926 specs
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B

Claas Challenger 35

Agricultural

power
210 hp
displacement
403 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full Challenger 35 specs
ClaasClaas Atles 926
vs
ClaasClaas Challenger 35

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

▲ Atles 926 higher · +22 hp (+10%)
Atles 926232 hp
Challenger 35210 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

Atles 926 is in the 85th percentile; Challenger 35 is in the 83rd · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Atles 926 higher · +33 ci (+8%)
Atles 926436 ci
Challenger 35403 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

Atles 926 is in the 78th percentile; Challenger 35 is in the 68th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Atles 9266
Challenger 356
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

Atles 926 is in the 74th percentile; Challenger 35 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ Atles 926 higher · +2 (+13%)
Atles 92618
Challenger 3516
Median Agricultural Tractor16

Atles 926 is in the 68th percentile; Challenger 35 is in the 50th · 972 models

Atles 926 (A)Challenger 35 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecClaas Atles 926Claas Challenger 35Difference
ManufacturerClaasClaasSame
ModelAtles 926Challenger 35—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecClaas Atles 926Claas Challenger 35Difference
ManufacturerDeutzCaterpillar—
ModelBF6L1013FC3116—
Power Output232hp210hp▲ Atles 926+22 hp · +10%
Rated RPM2,000RPM2,100RPM▲ Challenger 35+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement436ci403ci▲ Atles 926+33 ci · +8%
Bore4.3in4.1in▲ Atles 926+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke5.1in5in▲ Atles 926+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecClaas Atles 926Claas Challenger 35Difference
Type18-speedFull Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecClaas Atles 926Claas Challenger 35Difference
Length198in211in▲ Challenger 35+13 in · +7%
WidthNot recorded91in—
Height126in120in▲ Atles 926+6 in · +5%
Operating Weight19,501lb22,262lb▲ Challenger 35+2,761 lb · +14%

Hydraulics

SpecClaas Atles 926Claas Challenger 35Difference
System TypeNot recordedVariable-displacement load-sensing pressure-compensated—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerDifferential Power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecClaas Atles 926Claas Challenger 35Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII/II—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecClaas Atles 926Claas Challenger 35Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDCrawler—
Drive Type4WDTrack—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerDifferential Power—

Electrical

SpecClaas Atles 926Claas Challenger 35Difference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Capacities

SpecClaas Atles 926Claas Challenger 35Difference
CoolantNot recorded8.6gal—

Operator Station

SpecClaas Atles 926Claas Challenger 35Difference
TypeNot recordedCabin—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 85th percentile (232 hp)B · 83rd percentile (210 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 78th percentile (436 ci)B · 68th percentile (403 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 68th percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 82nd percentile (19,501 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,262 lb)
A · Atles 926B · Challenger 35Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageClaas Atles 926Full spec pageClaas Challenger 35