Head to head · Agricultural

Claas Challenger 35 vs Schluter Super-Trac 2200 LS

Image not recorded
ClaasModel A

Claas Challenger 35

Agricultural

power
210 hp
displacement
403 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full Challenger 35 specs
ClaasClaas Challenger 35
vs
SchluterSchluter Super-Trac 2200 LS

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Challenger 35210 hp
Super-Trac 2200 LS210 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

Challenger 35 is in the 83rd percentile; Super-Trac 2200 LS is in the 83rd · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Super-Trac 2200 LS higher · +156 ci (+39%)
Challenger 35403 ci
Super-Trac 2200 LS559 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

Challenger 35 is in the 68th percentile; Super-Trac 2200 LS is in the 91st · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Challenger 356
Super-Trac 2200 LS6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

Challenger 35 is in the 74th percentile; Super-Trac 2200 LS is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ Super-Trac 2200 LS higher · +8 (+50%)
Challenger 3516
Super-Trac 2200 LS24
Median Agricultural Tractor16

Challenger 35 is in the 50th percentile; Super-Trac 2200 LS is in the 81st · 972 models

Challenger 35 (A)Super-Trac 2200 LS (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecClaas Challenger 35Schluter Super-Trac 2200 LSDifference
ManufacturerClaasSchluter—
ModelChallenger 35Super-Trac 2200 LS—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecClaas Challenger 35Schluter Super-Trac 2200 LSDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarLiebherr—
Model3116D 916 T—
Power Output210hp210hpSame
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement403ci559ci▲ Super-Trac 2200 LS+156 ci · +39%
Bore4.1in4.7in▲ Super-Trac 2200 LS+0.6 in · +15%
Stroke5in5.3in▲ Super-Trac 2200 LS+0.3 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecClaas Challenger 35Schluter Super-Trac 2200 LSDifference
TypeFull Power ShiftNot recorded—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecClaas Challenger 35Schluter Super-Trac 2200 LSDifference
Length211in235in▲ Super-Trac 2200 LS+24 in · +11%
Width91inNot recorded—
Height120in128in▲ Super-Trac 2200 LS+8 in · +7%
Operating Weight22,262lb19,161lb▲ Challenger 35+3,101 lb · +16%

Hydraulics

SpecClaas Challenger 35Schluter Super-Trac 2200 LSDifference
System TypeVariable-displacement load-sensing pressure-compensatedNot recorded—
Steering TypeDifferential PowerHydrostatic power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecClaas Challenger 35Schluter Super-Trac 2200 LSDifference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIII/IINot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecClaas Challenger 35Schluter Super-Trac 2200 LSDifference
Chassis TypeCrawler4x4 4WD—
Drive TypeTrack4WD—
Steering TypeDifferential PowerHydrostatic power—

Electrical

SpecClaas Challenger 35Schluter Super-Trac 2200 LSDifference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Capacities

SpecClaas Challenger 35Schluter Super-Trac 2200 LSDifference
Coolant8.6galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecClaas Challenger 35Schluter Super-Trac 2200 LSDifference
TypeCabinNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 83rd percentile (210 hp)B · 83rd percentile (210 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 68th percentile (403 ci)B · 91st percentile (559 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 81st percentile (24)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 89th percentile (22,262 lb)B · 81st percentile (19,161 lb)
A · Challenger 35B · Super-Trac 2200 LSMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageClaas Challenger 35Full spec pageSchluter Super-Trac 2200 LS