Head to head · Agricultural

Claas Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 3300 Trac

Image not recorded
ClaasModel B

Claas Xerion 3300 Trac

Agricultural

power
335 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full Xerion 3300 Trac specs
ClaasClaas Challenger 95E
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 3300 Trac

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 9711,130

Engine Power

▲ Challenger 95E higher · +75 hp (+22%)
Challenger 95E410 hp
Xerion 3300 Trac335 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

Challenger 95E is in the 97th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 96th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Challenger 95E higher · +192 ci (+36%)
Challenger 95E729 ci
Xerion 3300 Trac537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

Challenger 95E is in the 95th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 89th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Challenger 95E6
Xerion 3300 Trac6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

Challenger 95E is in the 74th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ Challenger 95E higher · +13,029 lb (+58%)
Challenger 95E35,520 lb
Xerion 3300 Trac22,491 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

Challenger 95E is in the 97th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 89th · 971 models

Challenger 95E (A)Xerion 3300 Trac (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecClaas Challenger 95EClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
ManufacturerClaasClaasSame
ModelChallenger 95EXerion 3300 Trac
CategoryCrawler, AgriculturalAgricultural

Engine

SpecClaas Challenger 95EClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelNot recordedC9
Power Output410hp335hpChallenger 95E+75 hp · +22%
Rated RPM2,100RPM1,700RPMChallenger 95E+400 RPM · +24%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement729ci537ciChallenger 95E+192 ci · +36%
Bore5.1in4.4inChallenger 95E+0.7 in · +16%
Stroke5.9in5.9inSame

Transmission

SpecClaas Challenger 95EClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
TypeFull Power ShiftHydrostatic

Dimensions & Weight

SpecClaas Challenger 95EClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
LengthNot recorded261in
HeightNot recorded147in
Operating Weight35,520lb22,491lbChallenger 95E+13,029 lb · +58%

Hydraulics

SpecClaas Challenger 95EClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
System TypeClosed CenterNot recorded
Steering TypeHydrostatic Differential SteeringHydrostatic power

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecClaas Challenger 95EClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
TypeRearNot recorded
Speed 11,000rpmNot recorded

Chassis & Drive

SpecClaas Challenger 95EClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Chassis TypeCrawler4x4 4WD
Drive TypeNot recorded4WD
Steering TypeHydrostatic Differential SteeringHydrostatic power
Brake TypeHydraulic Caliper DiscNot recorded

Electrical

SpecClaas Challenger 95EClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded

Capacities

SpecClaas Challenger 95EClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Coolant20galNot recorded

Operator Station

SpecClaas Challenger 95EClaas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
TypeCab (Standard)Not recorded

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 97th percentile (410 hp)B · 96th percentile (335 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 95th percentile (729 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 97th percentile (35,520 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,491 lb)
A · Challenger 95EB · Xerion 3300 TracMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageClaas Challenger 95EFull spec pageClaas Xerion 3300 Trac