ClaasModel A
Claas Xerion 3300
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Claas Xerion 3300 vs Ford FW-60
Image not recorded
ClaasClaas Xerion 3300
vs
FordFord FW-60
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedXerion 3300335 hp
FW-60335 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Xerion 3300 is in the 97th percentile; FW-60 is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FW-60 higher · +366 ci (+68%)Xerion 3300537 ci
FW-60903 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Xerion 3300 is in the 94th percentile; FW-60 is in the 98th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FW-60 higher · +2 (+33%)Xerion 33006
FW-608
Median Utility Tractor4
Xerion 3300 is in the 93rd percentile; FW-60 is in the 99th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ FW-60 higher · +2,440 lb (+9%)Xerion 330028,660 lb
FW-6031,100 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Xerion 3300 is in the 97th percentile; FW-60 is in the 97th · 5,107 models
Xerion 3300 (A)FW-60 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Claas Xerion 3300 | Ford FW-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Claas | Ford | — |
| Model | Xerion 3300 | FW-60 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Claas Xerion 3300 | Ford FW-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Cummins | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 335hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ FW-60+500 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 | ▲ FW-60+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 537ci | 903ci | ▲ FW-60+366 ci · +68% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 5.5in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 4.8in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Claas Xerion 3300 | Ford FW-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Manual with hydraulic cerametallic dry discs clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Claas Xerion 3300 | Ford FW-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 261in | 267in | ▲ FW-60+6 in · +2% |
| Width | 98in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 147in | 134in | ▲ Xerion 3300+13 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 28,660lb | 31,100lb | ▲ FW-60+2,440 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Claas Xerion 3300 | Ford FW-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load Sensing | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Four-wheel steering | Articulated power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Claas Xerion 3300 | Ford FW-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Claas Xerion 3300 | Ford FW-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III N | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 12,502lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Claas Xerion 3300 | Ford FW-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Four-wheel steering | Articulated power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic dry disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Claas Xerion 3300 | Ford FW-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Claas Xerion 3300 | Ford FW-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 16.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Claas Xerion 3300 | Ford FW-60 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab with air-conditioning | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (335 hp)B · 97th percentile (335 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (537 ci)B · 98th percentile (903 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 97th percentile (28,660 lb)B · 97th percentile (31,100 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 97th percentile (261 in)B · 98th percentile (267 in)
A · Xerion 3300B · FW-60Median Utility Tractor