ClaasModel A
Claas Challenger 95E
Crawler
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Claas Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 4000
ClaasModel B
Claas Xerion 4000
Utility
- power
- 419 hp
- displacement
- 647 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ClaasClaas Challenger 95E
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 4000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ Xerion 4000 higher · +9 hp (+2%)Challenger 95E410 hp
Xerion 4000419 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
Challenger 95E is in the 77th percentile; Xerion 4000 is in the 77th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger 95E higher · +82 ci (+13%)Challenger 95E729 ci
Xerion 4000647 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
Challenger 95E is in the 75th percentile; Xerion 4000 is in the 71st · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedChallenger 95E6
Xerion 40006
Median Crawler Tractor6
Challenger 95E is in the 50th percentile; Xerion 4000 is in the 50th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ Xerion 4000 higher · +130 lb (<1%)Challenger 95E35,520 lb
Xerion 400035,650 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
Challenger 95E is in the 76th percentile; Xerion 4000 is in the 76th · 173 models
Challenger 95E (A)Xerion 4000 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Claas | Claas | Same |
| Model | Challenger 95E | Xerion 4000 | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Mercedes-Benz | — |
| Model | Not recorded | OM 470 LA | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 419hp | ▲ Xerion 4000+9 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,900RPM | ▲ Challenger 95E+200 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 729ci | 647ci | ▲ Challenger 95E+82 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 4.9in | ▲ Challenger 95E+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.7in | ▲ Challenger 95E+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Hydro-mechanical CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 299in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 98in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 155in | — |
| Operating Weight | 35,520lb | 35,650lb | ▲ Xerion 4000+130 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Caliper Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 20gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab (Standard) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 77th percentile (410 hp)B · 77th percentile (419 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 75th percentile (729 ci)B · 71st percentile (647 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 76th percentile (35,520 lb)B · 76th percentile (35,650 lb)
A · Challenger 95EB · Xerion 4000Median Crawler Tractor