CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1750
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 283 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Row Crop
Cockshutt 1750 vs Zetor 10211
ZetorModel B
Zetor 10211
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 278 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CockshuttCockshutt 1750
vs
ZetorZetor 10211
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 1750 higher · +5 ci (+2%)1750283 ci
10211278 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1750 is in the 28th percentile; 10211 is in the 27th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 1750 higher · +2 (+50%)17506
102114
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1750 is in the 50th percentile; 10211 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 10211 higher · +10 (+167%)17506
1021116
Median Row Crop Tractor16
1750 is in the 11th percentile; 10211 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 10211 higher · +40 lb (<1%)17509,760 lb
102119,800 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
1750 is in the 30th percentile; 10211 is in the 31st · 1,350 models
1750 (A)10211 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1750 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Zetor | — |
| Model | 1750 | 10211 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1750 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha-Oliver | Zetor | — |
| Model | 4.6L 6-cyl gasoline | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 1750+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 1750+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 283ci | 278ci | ▲ 1750+5 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 10211+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4in | 4.7in | ▲ 10211+0.7 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1750 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1750 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 160in | 157in | ▲ 1750+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 80.6in | 76.8in | ▲ 1750+3.8 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 9,760lb | 9,800lb | ▲ 10211+40 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1750 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Cockshutt 1750 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 7.50-20 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1750 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1750 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1750 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1750 | Zetor 10211 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5gal | 4.8gal | ▲ 1750+0.2 gal · +4% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 28th percentile (283 ci)B · 27th percentile (278 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 11th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 30th percentile (9,760 lb)B · 31st percentile (9,800 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 24th percentile (160 in)B · 21st percentile (157 in)
A · 1750B · 10211Median Row Crop Tractor