CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1850
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 310 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Row Crop
Cockshutt 1850 vs Yanmar LX490
YanmarModel B
Yanmar LX490
Sub-Compact
- power
- 48.5 hp
- displacement
- 122 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CockshuttCockshutt 1850
vs
YanmarYanmar LX490
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 1850 higher · +188 ci (+154%)1850310 ci
LX490122 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1850 is in the 33rd percentile; LX490 is in the 2nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 1850 higher · +2 (+50%)18506
LX4904
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1850 is in the 50th percentile; LX490 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1850 higher · +5,347 lb (+148%)18508,965 lb
LX4903,618 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
1850 is in the 25th percentile; LX490 is in the 4th · 1,350 models
Length
▲ 1850 higher · +36 in (+29%)1850160 in
LX490124 in
Median Row Crop Tractor180 in
1850 is in the 24th percentile; LX490 is in the 4th · 1,157 models
1850 (A)LX490 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1850 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 1850 | LX490 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1850 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha-Oliver | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 5.1L 6-cyl gasoline | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 48.5hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ LX490+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 1850+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 310ci | 122ci | ▲ 1850+188 ci · +154% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.5in | ▲ 1850+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.4in | 3.6in | ▲ 1850+0.8 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1850 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1850 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 160in | 124in | ▲ 1850+36 in · +29% |
| Width | 86.5in | 83.4in | ▲ 1850+3.1 in · +4% |
| Height | 78.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,965lb | 3,618lb | ▲ 1850+5,347 lb · +148% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1850 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Cockshutt 1850 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1850 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 2,760lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1850 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1850 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1850 | Yanmar LX490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 5gal | 1.5gal | ▲ 1850+3.5 gal · +233% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 33rd percentile (310 ci)B · 2nd percentile (122 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 25th percentile (8,965 lb)B · 4th percentile (3,618 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 24th percentile (160 in)B · 4th percentile (124 in)
Width
median 91.2 inA · 39th percentile (86.5 in)B · 32nd percentile (83.4 in)
A · 1850B · LX490Median Row Crop Tractor