Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 80
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 334 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Head to head · Row Crop
Cockshutt 80 vs Minneapolis-Moline M-602
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline M-602
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 336 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
CockshuttCockshutt 80
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline M-602
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ M-602 higher · +2 ci (<1%)80334 ci
M-602336 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
80 is in the 36th percentile; M-602 is in the 37th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied804
M-6024
Median Row Crop Tractor6
80 is in the 17th percentile; M-602 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ M-602 higher · +7 (+233%)803
M-60210
Median Row Crop Tractor16
80 is in the 1st percentile; M-602 is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ M-602 higher · +1,280 lb (+27%)804,800 lb
M-6026,080 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
80 is in the 7th percentile; M-602 is in the 12th · 1,350 models
80 (A)M-602 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Minneapolis-Moline M-602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | 80 | M-602 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Minneapolis-Moline M-602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha-Oliver | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,200RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ M-602+300 RPM · +25% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 334ci | 336ci | ▲ M-602+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.6in | ▲ M-602+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ 80+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Minneapolis-Moline M-602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Minneapolis-Moline M-602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 79in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 72in | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,800lb | 6,080lb | ▲ M-602+1,280 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Minneapolis-Moline M-602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Minneapolis-Moline M-602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 6in | — |
| Rear Tread | 11.3in | 15.5in | ▲ M-602+4.2 in · +37% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Minneapolis-Moline M-602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Minneapolis-Moline M-602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Minneapolis-Moline M-602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Hand-crank | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 36th percentile (334 ci)B · 37th percentile (336 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 1st percentile (3)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 7th percentile (4,800 lb)B · 12th percentile (6,080 lb)
A · 80B · M-602Median Row Crop Tractor