Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 80
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 334 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
Head to head · Row Crop
Cockshutt 80 vs Twin City MTA
Image not recorded
Twin CityModel B
Twin City MTA
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 284 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 3
CockshuttCockshutt 80
vs
Twin CityTwin City MTA
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 80 higher · +50 ci (+18%)80334 ci
MTA284 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
80 is in the 36th percentile; MTA is in the 29th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied804
MTA4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
80 is in the 17th percentile; MTA is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied803
MTA3
Median Row Crop Tractor16
80 is in the 1st percentile; MTA is in the 1st · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ MTA higher · +60 lb (+1%)804,800 lb
MTA4,860 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
80 is in the 7th percentile; MTA is in the 7th · 1,350 models
80 (A)MTA (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Twin City | — |
| Model | 80 | MTA | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Waukesha-Oliver | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | Not recorded | KE | — |
| Rated RPM | 1,200RPM | 1,150RPM | ▲ 80+50 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 334ci | 284ci | ▲ 80+50 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ 80+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ 80+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 143in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 64.5in | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,800lb | 4,860lb | ▲ MTA+60 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.50x16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 9.00x36 | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tread | 11.3in | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Hand-crank | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 80 | Twin City MTA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 36th percentile (334 ci)B · 29th percentile (284 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 1st percentile (3)B · 1st percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 7th percentile (4,800 lb)B · 7th percentile (4,860 lb)
A · 80B · MTAMedian Row Crop Tractor