FarmallModel A
Farmall 1026
Agricultural
- power
- 127 hp
- displacement
- 407 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Farmall 1026 vs Farmall 1468
Image not recorded
FarmallModel B
Farmall 1468
Row Crop
- power
- 145 hp
- displacement
- 549 ci
- Cylinders
- 8
- Forward gears
- 16
FarmallFarmall 1026
vs
FarmallFarmall 1468
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 1468 higher · +18 hp (+14%)1026127 hp
1468145 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
1026 is in the 59th percentile; 1468 is in the 67th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1468 higher · +142 ci (+35%)1026407 ci
1468549 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
1026 is in the 68th percentile; 1468 is in the 90th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ 1468 higher · +2 (+33%)10266
14688
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
1026 is in the 74th percentile; 1468 is in the 99th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1468 higher · +750 lb (+7%)102611,100 lb
146811,850 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
1026 is in the 51st percentile; 1468 is in the 55th · 971 models
1026 (A)1468 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall 1026 | Farmall 1468 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | Farmall | Same |
| Model | 1026 | 1468 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall 1026 | Farmall 1468 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | International | — |
| Model | DT-407 | DV-550 | — |
| Power Output | 127hp | 145hp | ▲ 1468+18 hp · +14% |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1468+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 | ▲ 1468+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 407ci | 549ci | ▲ 1468+142 ci · +35% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.5in | ▲ 1468+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.6in | 4.3in | ▲ 1026+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall 1026 | Farmall 1468 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear / Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall 1026 | Farmall 1468 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | 168in | ▲ 1468+2 in · +1% |
| Width | Not recorded | 97.6in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 126in | — |
| Operating Weight | 11,100lb | 11,850lb | ▲ 1468+750 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall 1026 | Farmall 1468 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Farmall 1026 | Farmall 1468 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 1000 RPM | Independent with dry disc clutch | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Farmall 1026 | Farmall 1468 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall 1026 | Farmall 1468 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Independent hydraulic dry disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall 1026 | Farmall 1468 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Farmall 1026 | Farmall 1468 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6gal | 6.7gal | ▲ 1468+0.7 gal · +12% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Farmall 1026 | Farmall 1468 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 59th percentile (127 hp)B · 67th percentile (145 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 68th percentile (407 ci)B · 90th percentile (549 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 51st percentile (11,100 lb)B · 55th percentile (11,850 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 45th percentile (166 in)B · 47th percentile (168 in)
A · 1026B · 1468Median Agricultural Tractor