Head to head · Row Crop
Farmall 340 vs Fendt Farmer 102S
FendtModel B
Fendt Farmer 102S
Row Crop
- power
- 40 hp
- displacement
- 156 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
FarmallFarmall 340
vs
FendtFendt Farmer 102S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 340 higher · +7 hp (+18%)34047 hp
Farmer 102S40 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
340 is in the 5th percentile; Farmer 102S is in the 4th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmer 102S higher · +21 ci (+16%)340135 ci
Farmer 102S156 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
340 is in the 3rd percentile; Farmer 102S is in the 4th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 340 higher · +1 (+33%)3404
Farmer 102S3
Median Row Crop Tractor6
340 is in the 17th percentile; Farmer 102S is in the 2nd · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmer 102S higher · +11 (+220%)3405
Farmer 102S16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
340 is in the 7th percentile; Farmer 102S is in the 50th · 1,200 models
340 (A)Farmer 102S (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Farmall 340 | Fendt Farmer 102S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Farmall | Fendt | — |
| Model | 340 | Farmer 102S | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Farmall 340 | Fendt Farmer 102S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | MWM | — |
| Model | C-135 | D325-3 | — |
| Power Output | 47hp | 40hp | ▲ 340+7 hp · +18% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,175RPM | ▲ Farmer 102S+175 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 340+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 135ci | 156ci | ▲ Farmer 102S+21 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.7in | ▲ Farmer 102S+0.4 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 4.7in | ▲ Farmer 102S+0.6 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | Farmall 340 | Fendt Farmer 102S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear with dry disc clutch | Synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Farmall 340 | Fendt Farmer 102S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | 143in | ▲ Farmer 102S+26 in · +22% |
| Width | 63.8in | 66.9in | ▲ Farmer 102S+3.1 in · +5% |
| Height | 58.7in | 92.5in | ▲ Farmer 102S+33.8 in · +58% |
| Operating Weight | 4,740lb | 5,049lb | ▲ Farmer 102S+309 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Farmall 340 | Fendt Farmer 102S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Farmall 340 | Fendt Farmer 102S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Farmall 340 | Fendt Farmer 102S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Category 3 | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Farmall 340 | Fendt Farmer 102S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical dry disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Farmall 340 | Fendt Farmer 102S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Farmall 340 | Fendt Farmer 102S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Farmall 340 | Fendt Farmer 102S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open operator station | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 5th percentile (47 hp)B · 4th percentile (40 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 3rd percentile (135 ci)B · 4th percentile (156 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 2nd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 7th percentile (5)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 7th percentile (4,740 lb)B · 8th percentile (5,049 lb)
A · 340B · Farmer 102SMedian Row Crop Tractor