Head to head · Row Crop

Farmall BM vs Huber KC

Image not recorded
FarmallModel A

Farmall BM

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
248 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
5
Full BM specs
Huber KC Tractor
HuberModel B

Huber KC

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
284 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full KC specs
FarmallFarmall BM
vs
HuberHuber KC

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,409–1,417

Engine Displacement

▲ KC higher · +36 ci (+15%)
BM248 ci
KC284 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

BM is in the 16th percentile; KC is in the 29th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
BM4
KC4
Median Row Crop Tractor6

BM is in the 17th percentile; KC is in the 17th · 1,417 models

BM (A)KC (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecFarmall BMHuber KCDifference
ManufacturerFarmallHuber—
ModelBMKC—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecFarmall BMHuber KCDifference
ManufacturerInternational HarvesterWaukesha—
ModelNot recordedVK—
Cylinders44Same
Displacement248ci284ci▲ KC+36 ci · +15%
Bore3.9in4.3in▲ KC+0.4 in · +10%
Stroke5.3in5in▲ BM+0.3 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecFarmall BMHuber KCDifference
TypeGearGearSame

Hydraulics

SpecFarmall BMHuber KCDifference
Steering TypeManualManualSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecFarmall BMHuber KCDifference
Hitch Category3III—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecFarmall BMHuber KCDifference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x2 2WDSame
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeManualManualSame

Electrical

SpecFarmall BMHuber KCDifference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 16th percentile (248 ci)B · 29th percentile (284 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
A · BMB · KCMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageFarmall BMFull spec pageHuber KC