Head to head · Row Crop

Farmall Super AMD vs Huber KC

Image not recorded
FarmallModel A

Farmall Super AMD

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
264 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
5
Full Super AMD specs
Huber KC Tractor
HuberModel B

Huber KC

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
284 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full KC specs
FarmallFarmall Super AMD
vs
HuberHuber KC

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,409–1,417

Engine Displacement

▲ KC higher · +20 ci (+8%)
Super AMD264 ci
KC284 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Super AMD is in the 19th percentile; KC is in the 29th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Super AMD4
KC4
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Super AMD is in the 17th percentile; KC is in the 17th · 1,417 models

Super AMD (A)KC (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecFarmall Super AMDHuber KCDifference
ManufacturerFarmallHuber—
ModelSuper AMDKC—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecFarmall Super AMDHuber KCDifference
ManufacturerInternational HarvesterWaukesha—
ModelAD-264VK—
Cylinders44Same
Displacement264ci284ci▲ KC+20 ci · +8%
Bore4in4.3in▲ KC+0.3 in · +7%
Stroke5.3in5in▲ Super AMD+0.3 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecFarmall Super AMDHuber KCDifference
TypegearGearSame

Hydraulics

SpecFarmall Super AMDHuber KCDifference
Steering TypeNot recordedManual—

Hitch & Towing

SpecFarmall Super AMDHuber KCDifference
Hitch CategoryIIIIIISame
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecFarmall Super AMDHuber KCDifference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x2 2WDSame
Drive Type2WD2WDSame
Steering TypeNot recordedManual—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 19th percentile (264 ci)B · 29th percentile (284 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
A · Super AMDB · KCMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageFarmall Super AMDFull spec pageHuber KC