Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Fendt 209 vs Fendt 2096
Image not recorded
FendtFendt 209
vs
FendtFendt 2096
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 2096 higher · +0.1 hp (<1%)20992.5 hp
209692.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
209 is in the 79th percentile; 2096 is in the 79th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied209263 ci
2096263 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
209 is in the 74th percentile; 2096 is in the 74th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2094
20964
Median Utility Tractor4
209 is in the 50th percentile; 2096 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied20921
209621
Median Utility Tractor12
209 is in the 88th percentile; 2096 is in the 88th · 4,941 models
209 (A)2096 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt 2096 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | Fendt | Same |
| Model | 209 | 2096 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt 2096 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 92.5hp | 92.6hp | ▲ 2096+0.1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,300RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 263ci | 263ci | Same |
| Bore | 4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt 2096 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Overdrive, fully synchronized, close-ratio | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt 2096 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 77.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 98.4in | 98.4in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 6,834lb | 6,834lb | Same |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt 2096 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt 2096 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 335/80R18 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 480/70R30 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt 2096 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | 2 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt 2096 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Fendt 2096 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 79th percentile (92.5 hp)B · 79th percentile (92.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 74th percentile (263 ci)B · 74th percentile (263 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 88th percentile (21)B · 88th percentile (21)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)B · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)
A · 209B · 2096Median Utility Tractor