Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Fendt 209 vs John Deere 5090R
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 5090R
Utility
- power
- 92.3 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
FendtFendt 209
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 5090R
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 209 higher · +0.2 hp (<1%)20992.5 hp
5090R92.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
209 is in the 79th percentile; 5090R is in the 79th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5090R higher · +13 ci (+5%)209263 ci
5090R276 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
209 is in the 74th percentile; 5090R is in the 81st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2094
5090R4
Median Utility Tractor4
209 is in the 50th percentile; 5090R is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 209 higher · +5 (+31%)20921
5090R16
Median Utility Tractor12
209 is in the 88th percentile; 5090R is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
209 (A)5090R (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt 209 | John Deere 5090R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | John Deere | — |
| Model | 209 | 5090R | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt 209 | John Deere 5090R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 4045HL284 | — |
| Power Output | 92.5hp | 92.3hp | ▲ 209+0.2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 209+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 263ci | 276ci | ▲ 5090R+13 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4in | 4.2in | ▲ 5090R+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ 209+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt 209 | John Deere 5090R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | 16-speed | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt 209 | John Deere 5090R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 144in | ▲ 209+2 in · +1% |
| Width | 77.3in | 84.6in | ▲ 5090R+7.3 in · +9% |
| Height | 98.4in | 106in | ▲ 5090R+7.6 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 6,834lb | 9,740lb | ▲ 5090R+2,906 lb · +43% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt 209 | John Deere 5090R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center, Load-sensing pressure-flow compensated | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 31.7gpm | — |
| Pressure | Not recorded | 2,894psi | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Fendt 209 | John Deere 5090R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent with electro-hydraulic clutch | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Fendt 209 | John Deere 5090R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 335/80R18 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 480/70R30 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt 209 | John Deere 5090R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | 2 | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 6,790lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt 209 | John Deere 5090R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fendt 209 | John Deere 5090R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Fendt 209 | John Deere 5090R | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 79th percentile (92.5 hp)B · 79th percentile (92.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 74th percentile (263 ci)B · 81st percentile (276 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 88th percentile (21)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)B · 85th percentile (9,740 lb)
A · 209B · 5090RMedian Utility Tractor