Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Fendt 209 vs Kubota M5-091HDCC12
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota M5-091HDCC12
Utility
- power
- 92.5 hp
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
FendtFendt 209
vs
KubotaKubota M5-091HDCC12
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied20992.5 hp
M5-091HDCC1292.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
209 is in the 79th percentile; M5-091HDCC12 is in the 79th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 209 higher · +33 ci (+14%)209263 ci
M5-091HDCC12230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
209 is in the 74th percentile; M5-091HDCC12 is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2094
M5-091HDCC124
Median Utility Tractor4
209 is in the 50th percentile; M5-091HDCC12 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 209 higher · +9 (+75%)20921
M5-091HDCC1212
Median Utility Tractor12
209 is in the 88th percentile; M5-091HDCC12 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
209 (A)M5-091HDCC12 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Kubota M5-091HDCC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | Kubota | — |
| Model | 209 | M5-091HDCC12 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Kubota M5-091HDCC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | KUBOTA | — |
| Power Output | 92.5hp | 92.5hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ M5-091HDCC12+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 263ci | 230ci | ▲ 209+33 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Kubota M5-091HDCC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Fully synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Kubota M5-091HDCC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 156in | ▲ M5-091HDCC12+10 in · +7% |
| Width | 77.3in | 79.2in | ▲ M5-091HDCC12+1.9 in · +2% |
| Height | 98.4in | 101in | ▲ M5-091HDCC12+2.6 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 6,834lb | 6,901lb | ▲ M5-091HDCC12+67 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Kubota M5-091HDCC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power steering | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Kubota M5-091HDCC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Live-independent PTO, electro-hydraulic clutch with brake | — |
Tires
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Kubota M5-091HDCC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 335/80R18 | 11.2-24 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 480/70R30 | 16.9-30 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Kubota M5-091HDCC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category 3 | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Category | 2 | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 6,063lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Kubota M5-091HDCC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power steering | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Kubota M5-091HDCC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Fendt 209 | Kubota M5-091HDCC12 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 79th percentile (92.5 hp)B · 79th percentile (92.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 74th percentile (263 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 88th percentile (21)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)B · 66th percentile (6,901 lb)
A · 209B · M5-091HDCC12Median Utility Tractor