Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Fendt 209 vs TYM T954
Image not recorded
FendtFendt 209
vs
TYMTYM T954
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied20992.5 hp
T95492.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
209 is in the 79th percentile; T954 is in the 79th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 209 higher · +55 ci (+26%)209263 ci
T954208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
209 is in the 74th percentile; T954 is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied2094
T9544
Median Utility Tractor4
209 is in the 50th percentile; T954 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ T954 higher · +11 (+52%)20921
T95432
Median Utility Tractor12
209 is in the 88th percentile; T954 is in the 97th · 4,941 models
209 (A)T954 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt 209 | TYM T954 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | TYM | — |
| Model | 209 | T954 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt 209 | TYM T954 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Deutz | Doosan Infracore | — |
| Model | Not recorded | DL03-LEA05 | — |
| Power Output | 92.5hp | 92.5hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,300RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 263ci | 208ci | ▲ 209+55 ci · +26% |
| Bore | 4in | 3.9in | ▲ 209+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.5in | ▲ 209+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt 209 | TYM T954 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Two-speed power shift with power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt 209 | TYM T954 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 146in | 177in | ▲ T954+31 in · +21% |
| Width | 77.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 98.4in | 108in | ▲ T954+9.6 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 6,834lb | 8,688lb | ▲ T954+1,854 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt 209 | TYM T954 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Fendt 209 | TYM T954 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 335/80R18 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 480/70R30 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt 209 | TYM T954 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | 2 | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt 209 | TYM T954 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Fendt 209 | TYM T954 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 79th percentile (92.5 hp)B · 79th percentile (92.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 74th percentile (263 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 88th percentile (21)B · 97th percentile (32)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)B · 80th percentile (8,688 lb)
A · 209B · T954Median Utility Tractor