FendtModel A
Fendt 209V
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Fendt 209V vs John Deere 8230
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 8230
Row Crop
- power
- 245 hp
- displacement
- 548 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
FendtFendt 209V
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 8230
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 8230 higher · +347 ci (+173%)209V201 ci
8230548 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
209V is in the 16th percentile; 8230 is in the 90th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ 8230 higher · +3 (+100%)209V3
82306
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
209V is in the 8th percentile; 8230 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 8230 higher · +18,059 lb (+317%)209V5,688 lb
823023,747 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
209V is in the 17th percentile; 8230 is in the 90th · 971 models
Length
▲ 8230 higher · +78 in (+55%)209V141 in
8230219 in
Median Agricultural Tractor173 in
209V is in the 21st percentile; 8230 is in the 90th · 829 models
209V (A)8230 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fendt 209V | John Deere 8230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fendt | John Deere | — |
| Model | 209V | 8230 | — |
| Category | Agricultural, Orchard/Vineyard | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Fendt 209V | John Deere 8230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | PowerTech | — |
| Power Output | Not recorded | 245hp | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 6 | ▲ 8230+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 201ci | 548ci | ▲ 8230+347 ci · +173% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.7in | ▲ 8230+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.4in | ▲ 8230+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fendt 209V | John Deere 8230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fendt 209V | John Deere 8230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 141in | 219in | ▲ 8230+78 in · +55% |
| Width | 45.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 95in | 123in | ▲ 8230+28 in · +29% |
| Operating Weight | 5,688lb | 23,747lb | ▲ 8230+18,059 lb · +317% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fendt 209V | John Deere 8230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center PFC | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power steering | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Fendt 209V | John Deere 8230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fendt 209V | John Deere 8230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | 3 | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 12,400lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fendt 209V | John Deere 8230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | MFWD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power steering | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fendt 209V | John Deere 8230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Fendt 209V | John Deere 8230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 10.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Fendt 209V | John Deere 8230 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | CommandView cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 16th percentile (201 ci)B · 90th percentile (548 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 8th percentile (3)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 17th percentile (5,688 lb)B · 90th percentile (23,747 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 21st percentile (141 in)B · 90th percentile (219 in)
Height
median 111 inA · 24th percentile (95 in)B · 81st percentile (123 in)
A · 209VB · 8230Median Agricultural Tractor