Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Fiat 512R vs McCormick Intl MB65
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl MB65
Utility
- power
- 67 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
FiatFiat 512R
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl MB65
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MB65 higher · +8 hp (+14%)512R59 hp
MB6567 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
512R is in the 53rd percentile; MB65 is in the 61st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MB65 higher · +15 ci (+6%)512R254 ci
MB65269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
512R is in the 72nd percentile; MB65 is in the 77th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied512R4
MB654
Median Utility Tractor4
512R is in the 50th percentile; MB65 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MB65 higher · +5 (+71%)512R7
MB6512
Median Utility Tractor12
512R is in the 15th percentile; MB65 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
512R (A)MB65 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fiat 512R | McCormick Intl MB65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 512R | MB65 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fiat 512R | McCormick Intl MB65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FIAT | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1104C-44 | — |
| Power Output | 59hp | 67hp | ▲ MB65+8 hp · +14% |
| Rated RPM | 1,750RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MB65+450 RPM · +26% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 254ci | 269ci | ▲ MB65+15 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5in | ▲ MB65+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fiat 512R | McCormick Intl MB65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fiat 512R | McCormick Intl MB65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 135in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 72in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 100in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,225lb | 5,285lb | ▲ MB65+60 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fiat 512R | McCormick Intl MB65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fiat 512R | McCormick Intl MB65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category II | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fiat 512R | McCormick Intl MB65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 53rd percentile (59 hp)B · 61st percentile (67 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 72nd percentile (254 ci)B · 77th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 15th percentile (7)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 50th percentile (5,225 lb)B · 50th percentile (5,285 lb)
A · 512RB · MB65Median Utility Tractor