Head to head · Utility
Fiat 702 vs McCormick-Deering W-9
McCormick-DeeringModel B
McCormick-Deering W-9
Utility
- power
- 49.4 hp
- displacement
- 335 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 5
FiatFiat 702
vs
McCormick-DeeringMcCormick-Deering W-9
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ W-9 higher · +19.4 hp (+65%)70230 hp
W-949.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
702 is in the 22nd percentile; W-9 is in the 44th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 702 higher · +45 ci (+13%)702380 ci
W-9335 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
702 is in the 89th percentile; W-9 is in the 86th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied7024
W-94
Median Utility Tractor4
702 is in the 50th percentile; W-9 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ W-9 higher · +2 (+67%)7023
W-95
Median Utility Tractor12
702 is in the 3rd percentile; W-9 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
702 (A)W-9 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fiat 702 | McCormick-Deering W-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | McCormick-Deering | — |
| Model | 702 | W-9 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Fiat 702 | McCormick-Deering W-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | International Harvester | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 5.5L 4-cyl | — |
| Power Output | 30hp | 49.4hp | ▲ W-9+19.4 hp · +65% |
| Rated RPM | 900RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ W-9+600 RPM · +67% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 380ci | 335ci | ▲ 702+45 ci · +13% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.4in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Fiat 702 | McCormick-Deering W-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fiat 702 | McCormick-Deering W-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 126in | 134in | ▲ W-9+8 in · +6% |
| Width | 65in | 68.5in | ▲ W-9+3.5 in · +5% |
| Height | 75in | 66in | ▲ 702+9 in · +14% |
| Operating Weight | 5,954lb | 6,350lb | ▲ W-9+396 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fiat 702 | McCormick-Deering W-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fiat 702 | McCormick-Deering W-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Fiat 702 | McCormick-Deering W-9 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 10gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 22nd percentile (30 hp)B · 44th percentile (49.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 89th percentile (380 ci)B · 86th percentile (335 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 3rd percentile (3)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 56th percentile (5,954 lb)B · 60th percentile (6,350 lb)
A · 702B · W-9Median Utility Tractor