Head to head · Utility
Fiat 800 vs Ford 6610S
FiatFiat 800
vs
FordFord 6610S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 6610S higher · +5 hp (+6%)80080 hp
6610S85 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
800 is in the 71st percentile; 6610S is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6610S higher · +2 ci (<1%)800302 ci
6610S304 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
800 is in the 84th percentile; 6610S is in the 84th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8004
6610S4
Median Utility Tractor4
800 is in the 50th percentile; 6610S is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 800 higher · +4 (+50%)80012
6610S8
Median Utility Tractor12
800 is in the 50th percentile; 6610S is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
800 (A)6610S (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fiat 800 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Ford | — |
| Model | 800 | 6610S | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fiat 800 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Ford | — |
| Model | OM CO 3/80 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 80hp | 85hp | ▲ 6610S+5 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 6610S+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 302ci | 304ci | ▲ 6610S+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ 6610S+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.1in | 5in | ▲ 800+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fiat 800 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Manual | Unsynchronized Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fiat 800 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 160in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 76in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 59.8in | 95.9in | ▲ 6610S+36.1 in · +60% |
| Operating Weight | 6,526lb | 5,695lb | ▲ 800+831 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fiat 800 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear Pump | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fiat 800 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fiat 800 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fiat 800 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Fiat 800 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Fiat 800 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 71st percentile (80 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (302 ci)B · 84th percentile (304 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 62nd percentile (6,526 lb)B · 53rd percentile (5,695 lb)
A · 800B · 6610SMedian Utility Tractor