Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Fiat 850 vs Ford 6610S
FiatFiat 850
vs
FordFord 6610S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied85085 hp
6610S85 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
850 is in the 75th percentile; 6610S is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6610S higher · +3 ci (<1%)850301 ci
6610S304 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
850 is in the 84th percentile; 6610S is in the 84th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied8504
6610S4
Median Utility Tractor4
850 is in the 50th percentile; 6610S is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 850 higher · +8 (+100%)85016
6610S8
Median Utility Tractor12
850 is in the 73rd percentile; 6610S is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
850 (A)6610S (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fiat 850 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Ford | — |
| Model | 850 | 6610S | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Fiat 850 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Ford | — |
| Model | CO3/80 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 85hp | 85hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 6610S+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 301ci | 304ci | ▲ 6610S+3 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ 6610S+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.1in | 5in | ▲ 850+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fiat 850 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized / Creeper | Unsynchronized Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fiat 850 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 143in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 61in | 95.9in | ▲ 6610S+34.9 in · +57% |
| Operating Weight | 6,835lb | 5,695lb | ▲ 850+1,140 lb · +20% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fiat 850 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Gear Pump | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Fiat 850 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tire Size | 38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fiat 850 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fiat 850 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Fiat 850 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 volt electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Fiat 850 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.4gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Fiat 850 | Ford 6610S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (85 hp)B · 75th percentile (85 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (301 ci)B · 84th percentile (304 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 65th percentile (6,835 lb)B · 53rd percentile (5,695 lb)
A · 850B · 6610SMedian Utility Tractor