
Head to head · Utility
Fiat 955C vs John Deere 310E


John DeereModel B
John Deere 310E
Specialized
- power
- 76 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
FiatFiat 955C
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 310E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 955C higher · +12 hp (+16%)955C88 hp
310E76 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
955C is in the 76th percentile; 310E is in the 69th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 955C higher · +3 ci (+1%)955C279 ci
310E276 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
955C is in the 82nd percentile; 310E is in the 81st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 955C higher · +1 (+25%)955C5
310E4
Median Utility Tractor4
955C is in the 88th percentile; 310E is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 955C higher · +4 (+100%)955C8
310E4
Median Utility Tractor12
955C is in the 23rd percentile; 310E is in the 4th · 4,941 models
955C (A)310E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Fiat 955C | John Deere 310E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | John Deere | — |
| Model | 955C | 310E | — |
| Category | Utility | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | Fiat 955C | John Deere 310E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | John Deere | — |
| Model | 8055 | 4045D | — |
| Power Output | 88hp | 76hp | ▲ 955C+12 hp · +16% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 955C+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 5 | 4 | ▲ 955C+1 · +25% |
| Displacement | 279ci | 276ci | ▲ 955C+3 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 310E+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 5in | ▲ 310E+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Fiat 955C | John Deere 310E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Fiat 955C | John Deere 310E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 140in | 279in | ▲ 310E+139 in · +99% |
| Width | 76.8in | 85.8in | ▲ 310E+9 in · +12% |
| Height | 94.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 13,051lb | 12,800lb | ▲ 955C+251 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Fiat 955C | John Deere 310E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Fiat 955C | John Deere 310E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/II Opt | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Fiat 955C | John Deere 310E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Fiat 955C | John Deere 310E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Fiat 955C | John Deere 310E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.3gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Fiat 955C | John Deere 310E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS or Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 76th percentile (88 hp)B · 69th percentile (76 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 82nd percentile (279 ci)B · 81st percentile (276 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 88th percentile (5)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 4th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 91st percentile (13,051 lb)B · 91st percentile (12,800 lb)
A · 955CB · 310EMedian Utility Tractor