Head to head · Utility
Ford 1000 vs Massey Ferguson GC1715
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson GC1715
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 68.5 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 1000
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson GC1715
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied100025 hp
GC171525 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1000 is in the 16th percentile; GC1715 is in the 16th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1000 higher · +9.1 ci (+13%)100077.6 ci
GC171568.5 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1000 is in the 11th percentile; GC1715 is in the 8th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GC1715 higher · +1 (+50%)10002
GC17153
Median Utility Tractor4
1000 is in the 3rd percentile; GC1715 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1000 higher · +867 lb (+61%)10002,300 lb
GC17151,433 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1000 is in the 14th percentile; GC1715 is in the 5th · 5,107 models
1000 (A)GC1715 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 1000 | GC1715 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Iseki | — |
| Model | LE892 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 3,000RPM | ▲ GC1715+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ GC1715+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.6ci | 68.5ci | ▲ 1000+9.1 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.1in | ▲ 1000+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.1in | ▲ 1000+0.8 in · +26% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 101in | 97.2in | ▲ 1000+3.8 in · +4% |
| Width | Not recorded | 47.2in | — |
| Height | 54.3in | 72.4in | ▲ GC1715+18.1 in · +33% |
| Operating Weight | 2,300lb | 1,433lb | ▲ 1000+867 lb · +61% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 2,000rpm | ▲ GC1715+1,460 rpm · +270% |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Category I | Same |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,190lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1000 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open, Optional two-post ROPS | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 16th percentile (25 hp)B · 16th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.6 ci)B · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,300 lb)B · 5th percentile (1,433 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 9th percentile (101 in)B · 7th percentile (97.2 in)
A · 1000B · GC1715Median Utility Tractor