Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1110 vs Ford 860
FordFord 1110
vs
FordFord 860
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 860 higher · +129 ci (+299%)111043.1 ci
860172 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1110 is in the 1st percentile; 860 is in the 46th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 860 higher · +2 (+100%)11102
8604
Median Utility Tractor4
1110 is in the 3rd percentile; 860 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1110 higher · +5 (+100%)111010
8605
Median Utility Tractor12
1110 is in the 39th percentile; 860 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 860 higher · +2,117 lb (+165%)11101,283 lb
8603,400 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1110 is in the 3rd percentile; 860 is in the 28th · 5,107 models
1110 (A)860 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1110 | 860 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Ford | — |
| Model | LEK757C | EAF | — |
| Power Output | 13hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,700RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 1110+500 RPM · +23% |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 | ▲ 860+2 · +100% |
| Displacement | 43.1ci | 172ci | ▲ 860+129 ci · +299% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.9in | ▲ 860+0.9 in · +30% |
| Stroke | 3.2in | 3.6in | ▲ 860+0.5 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 101in | 122in | ▲ 860+21 in · +21% |
| Width | 43.3in | 64.6in | ▲ 860+21.3 in · +49% |
| Height | 50.4in | 59.1in | ▲ 860+8.7 in · +17% |
| Operating Weight | 1,283lb | 3,400lb | ▲ 860+2,117 lb · +165% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 6.00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 28-Dec | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-point | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 881lb | 1,250lb | ▲ 860+369 lb · +42% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4x2 2WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical drum brakes | Internal expanding shoes | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | 3.8gal | ▲ 860+3 gal · +375% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1110 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with optional ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 1st percentile (43.1 ci)B · 46th percentile (172 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 39th percentile (10)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 3rd percentile (1,283 lb)B · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 9th percentile (101 in)B · 30th percentile (122 in)
A · 1110B · 860Median Utility Tractor