Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1120 vs Ford 860
FordFord 1120
vs
FordFord 860
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 860 higher · +118 ci (+221%)112053.6 ci
860172 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1120 is in the 3rd percentile; 860 is in the 46th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 860 higher · +1 (+33%)11203
8604
Median Utility Tractor4
1120 is in the 23rd percentile; 860 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1120 higher · +4 (+80%)11209
8605
Median Utility Tractor12
1120 is in the 35th percentile; 860 is in the 6th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 860 higher · +2,062 lb (+154%)11201,338 lb
8603,400 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1120 is in the 4th percentile; 860 is in the 28th · 5,107 models
1120 (A)860 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Ford | Same |
| Model | 1120 | 860 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Ford | — |
| Model | S723 | EAF | — |
| Power Output | 19.7hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ 1120+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 860+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 53.6ci | 172ci | ▲ 860+118 ci · +221% |
| Bore | 2.8in | 3.9in | ▲ 860+1.1 in · +39% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 3.6in | ▲ 860+0.8 in · +29% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear type | Unsynchronized gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | 122in | ▲ 860+16 in · +15% |
| Width | 40.9in | 64.6in | ▲ 860+23.7 in · +58% |
| Height | 80.1in | 59.1in | ▲ 1120+21 in · +36% |
| Operating Weight | 1,338lb | 3,400lb | ▲ 860+2,062 lb · +154% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 6.00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 28-Dec | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Three-point | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,410lb | 1,250lb | ▲ 1120+160 lb · +13% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Manual | Same |
| Brake Type | Expanding shoe | Internal expanding shoes | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | 3.8gal | ▲ 860+2.9 gal · +322% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1120 | Ford 860 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with two-post ROPS | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 3rd percentile (53.6 ci)B · 46th percentile (172 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 6th percentile (5)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 4th percentile (1,338 lb)B · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 13th percentile (106 in)B · 30th percentile (122 in)
A · 1120B · 860Median Utility Tractor