Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford 1220
Utility
- power
- 17 hp
- displacement
- 58.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1220 vs Rhino 182
FordFord 1220
vs
RhinoRhino 182
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 182 higher · +1 hp (+6%)122017 hp
18218 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1220 is in the 5th percentile; 182 is in the 6th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1220 higher · +3.1 ci (+6%)122058.2 ci
18255.1 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1220 is in the 5th percentile; 182 is in the 4th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1220 higher · +2 (+200%)12203
1821
Median Utility Tractor4
1220 is in the 23rd percentile; 182 is in the 1st · 5,720 models
1220 (A)182 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Rhino 182 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Rhino | — |
| Model | 1220 | 182 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Rhino 182 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Jinma | — |
| Model | S753 | TY1100 | — |
| Power Output | 17hp | 18hp | ▲ 182+1 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 1 | ▲ 1220+2 · +200% |
| Displacement | 58.2ci | 55.1ci | ▲ 1220+3.1 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.9in | ▲ 182+0.9 in · +30% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 4.5in | ▲ 182+1.7 in · +61% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Rhino 182 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Rhino 182 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 106in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 40.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 80.1in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Rhino 182 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Rhino 182 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Rhino 182 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Rhino 182 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Expanding shoe | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Rhino 182 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1220 | Rhino 182 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open Operator Station with two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 5th percentile (17 hp)B · 6th percentile (18 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 5th percentile (58.2 ci)B · 4th percentile (55.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 1st percentile (1)
A · 1220B · 182Median Utility Tractor