Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1500 vs Mitsubishi MT200
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT200
Utility
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 68.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
FordFord 1500
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT200 higher · +0.2 hp (+1%)150019.8 hp
MT20020 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1500 is in the 8th percentile; MT200 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1500 higher · +0.5 ci (<1%)150069.2 ci
MT20068.7 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1500 is in the 10th percentile; MT200 is in the 9th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT200 higher · +1 (+50%)15002
MT2003
Median Utility Tractor4
1500 is in the 3rd percentile; MT200 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1500 higher · +6 (+100%)150012
MT2006
Median Utility Tractor12
1500 is in the 50th percentile; MT200 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
1500 (A)MT200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1500 | Mitsubishi MT200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 1500 | MT200 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1500 | Mitsubishi MT200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | LET862C | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 19.8hp | 20hp | ▲ MT200+0.2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ MT200+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 69.2ci | 68.7ci | ▲ 1500+0.5 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1500 | Mitsubishi MT200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1500 | Mitsubishi MT200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 110in | 107in | ▲ 1500+3 in · +3% |
| Width | Not recorded | 46in | — |
| Height | 84.3in | 82.3in | ▲ 1500+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 2,144lb | 2,017lb | ▲ 1500+127 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1500 | Mitsubishi MT200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1500 | Mitsubishi MT200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1500 | Mitsubishi MT200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1500 | Mitsubishi MT200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1500 | Mitsubishi MT200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1500 | Mitsubishi MT200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1500 | Mitsubishi MT200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 8th percentile (19.8 hp)B · 8th percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 10th percentile (69.2 ci)B · 9th percentile (68.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 13th percentile (2,144 lb)B · 12th percentile (2,017 lb)
A · 1500B · MT200Median Utility Tractor