Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel A
Cub Cadet 7195
Utility
- power
- 19 hp
- displacement
- 64.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Cub Cadet 7195 vs Ford 1500
Image not recorded
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7195
vs
FordFord 1500
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1500 higher · +0.8 hp (+4%)719519 hp
150019.8 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
7195 is in the 7th percentile; 1500 is in the 8th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1500 higher · +4.5 ci (+7%)719564.7 ci
150069.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
7195 is in the 7th percentile; 1500 is in the 10th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 7195 higher · +1 (+50%)71953
15002
Median Utility Tractor4
7195 is in the 23rd percentile; 1500 is in the 3rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1500 higher · +152 lb (+8%)71951,992 lb
15002,144 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
7195 is in the 12th percentile; 1500 is in the 13th · 5,107 models
7195 (A)1500 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Ford 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cub Cadet | Ford | — |
| Model | 7195 | 1500 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Ford 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Mitsubishi | Shibaura | — |
| Model | K3E | LET862C | — |
| Power Output | 19hp | 19.8hp | ▲ 1500+0.8 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 | ▲ 7195+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 64.7ci | 69.2ci | ▲ 1500+4.5 ci · +7% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.4in | ▲ 1500+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 3.1in | 3.9in | ▲ 1500+0.8 in · +26% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Ford 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Ford 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 107in | 110in | ▲ 1500+3 in · +3% |
| Width | 46.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 78.9in | 84.3in | ▲ 1500+5.4 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 1,992lb | 2,144lb | ▲ 1500+152 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Ford 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Ford 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Transmission | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Ford 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Ford 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Ford 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Ford 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.5gal | 1.4gal | ▲ 7195+0.1 gal · +7% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cub Cadet 7195 | Ford 1500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 7th percentile (19 hp)B · 8th percentile (19.8 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 7th percentile (64.7 ci)B · 10th percentile (69.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 3rd percentile (2)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 12th percentile (1,992 lb)B · 13th percentile (2,144 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 13th percentile (107 in)B · 16th percentile (110 in)
A · 7195B · 1500Median Utility Tractor