Head to head · Utility
Ford 1700 vs Mitsubishi GS252
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GS252
Utility
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 1700
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GS252
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GS252 higher · +0.8 hp (+3%)170023.9 hp
GS25224.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1700 is in the 13th percentile; GS252 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GS252 higher · +2.7 ci (+3%)170077.7 ci
GS25280.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1700 is in the 11th percentile; GS252 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GS252 higher · +1 (+50%)17002
GS2523
Median Utility Tractor4
1700 is in the 3rd percentile; GS252 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ GS252 higher · +180 lb (+7%)17002,444 lb
GS2522,624 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1700 is in the 16th percentile; GS252 is in the 18th · 5,107 models
1700 (A)GS252 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1700 | Mitsubishi GS252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | 1700 | GS252 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1700 | Mitsubishi GS252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | LE892 | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 23.9hp | 24.7hp | ▲ GS252+0.8 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ GS252+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.7ci | 80.4ci | ▲ GS252+2.7 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.1in | ▲ 1700+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.6in | ▲ 1700+0.3 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1700 | Mitsubishi GS252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1700 | Mitsubishi GS252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 111in | 110in | ▲ 1700+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 59.3in | 50in | ▲ 1700+9.3 in · +19% |
| Height | 85.5in | 77.6in | ▲ 1700+7.9 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 2,444lb | 2,624lb | ▲ GS252+180 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1700 | Mitsubishi GS252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1700 | Mitsubishi GS252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1700 | Mitsubishi GS252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | JIS0 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1700 | Mitsubishi GS252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1700 | Mitsubishi GS252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1700 | Mitsubishi GS252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1700 | Mitsubishi GS252 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with ROPS | Cab or ROPS options | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 13th percentile (23.9 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.7 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 16th percentile (2,444 lb)B · 18th percentile (2,624 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 16th percentile (111 in)B · 16th percentile (110 in)
A · 1700B · GS252Median Utility Tractor