Head to head · Utility
Ford 1700 vs New Holland Workmaster 25
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland Workmaster 25
Utility
- power
- 24.4 hp
- displacement
- 80.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
FordFord 1700
vs
New HollandNew Holland Workmaster 25
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Workmaster 25 higher · +0.5 hp (+2%)170023.9 hp
Workmaster 2524.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1700 is in the 13th percentile; Workmaster 25 is in the 15th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Workmaster 25 higher · +2.7 ci (+3%)170077.7 ci
Workmaster 2580.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1700 is in the 11th percentile; Workmaster 25 is in the 12th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Workmaster 25 higher · +1 (+50%)17002
Workmaster 253
Median Utility Tractor4
1700 is in the 3rd percentile; Workmaster 25 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied170012
Workmaster 2512
Median Utility Tractor12
1700 is in the 50th percentile; Workmaster 25 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
1700 (A)Workmaster 25 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1700 | New Holland Workmaster 25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 1700 | Workmaster 25 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1700 | New Holland Workmaster 25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | LE892 | S3L2 | — |
| Power Output | 23.9hp | 24.4hp | ▲ Workmaster 25+0.5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,500RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 | ▲ Workmaster 25+1 · +50% |
| Displacement | 77.7ci | 80.4ci | ▲ Workmaster 25+2.7 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.1in | ▲ 1700+0.4 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.6in | ▲ 1700+0.3 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1700 | New Holland Workmaster 25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear shift | Sync shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1700 | New Holland Workmaster 25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 111in | 117in | ▲ Workmaster 25+6 in · +5% |
| Width | 59.3in | 54.1in | ▲ 1700+5.2 in · +10% |
| Height | 85.5in | 88.2in | ▲ Workmaster 25+2.7 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 2,444lb | 2,469lb | ▲ Workmaster 25+25 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1700 | New Holland Workmaster 25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1700 | New Holland Workmaster 25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear, transmission | Rear 540 / Mid 2000 | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 2,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1700 | New Holland Workmaster 25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-point hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1700 | New Holland Workmaster 25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical drum | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1700 | New Holland Workmaster 25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 1700 | New Holland Workmaster 25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.4gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1700 | New Holland Workmaster 25 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open with ROPS | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 13th percentile (23.9 hp)B · 15th percentile (24.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 11th percentile (77.7 ci)B · 12th percentile (80.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 3rd percentile (2)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 16th percentile (2,444 lb)B · 16th percentile (2,469 lb)
A · 1700B · Workmaster 25Median Utility Tractor