Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 3000 vs Massey Ferguson 240
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 240
Utility
- power
- 46 hp
- displacement
- 152 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
FordFord 3000
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 240
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 3000 higher · +0.7 hp (+2%)300046.7 hp
24046 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
3000 is in the 41st percentile; 240 is in the 40th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 3000 higher · +6 ci (+4%)3000158 ci
240152 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
3000 is in the 42nd percentile; 240 is in the 39th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied30003
2403
Median Utility Tractor4
3000 is in the 23rd percentile; 240 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied30008
2408
Median Utility Tractor12
3000 is in the 23rd percentile; 240 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
3000 (A)240 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 3000 | 240 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Perkins | — |
| Model | Ford 2.6L 3-cyl gasoline | AD3.152 | — |
| Power Output | 46.7hp | 46hp | ▲ 3000+0.7 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 3000+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 158ci | 152ci | ▲ 3000+6 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 3.6in | ▲ 3000+0.6 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 3.8in | 5in | ▲ 240+1.2 in · +32% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Sliding gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 127in | 125in | ▲ 3000+2 in · +2% |
| Width | 63.8in | 65.7in | ▲ 240+1.9 in · +3% |
| Height | 82.7in | 86.6in | ▲ 240+3.9 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 4,185lb | 4,015lb | ▲ 3000+170 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Transmission, live, independent | Live | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 6.00-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 13.6-28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical expanding shoe | Mechanical drum | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.5gal | 2.6gal | ▲ 3000+0.9 gal · +35% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 3000 | Massey Ferguson 240 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 41st percentile (46.7 hp)B · 40th percentile (46 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 42nd percentile (158 ci)B · 39th percentile (152 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 39th percentile (4,185 lb)B · 37th percentile (4,015 lb)
A · 3000B · 240Median Utility Tractor