Head to head · Utility
Ford 5000 vs Massey Ferguson 1024
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 1024
Row Crop
- power
- 127 hp
- displacement
- 354 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
FordFord 5000
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 1024
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1024 higher · +57.9 hp (+84%)500069.1 hp
1024127 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5000 is in the 62nd percentile; 1024 is in the 91st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1024 higher · +121 ci (+52%)5000233 ci
1024354 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5000 is in the 63rd percentile; 1024 is in the 86th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1024 higher · +2 (+50%)50004
10246
Median Utility Tractor4
5000 is in the 50th percentile; 1024 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1024 higher · +4 (+50%)50008
102412
Median Utility Tractor12
5000 is in the 23rd percentile; 1024 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
5000 (A)1024 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Massey Ferguson 1024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 5000 | 1024 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Massey Ferguson 1024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | A6.354.4 | — |
| Power Output | 69.1hp | 127hp | ▲ 1024+57.9 hp · +84% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 1024+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 1024+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 233ci | 354ci | ▲ 1024+121 ci · +52% |
| Bore | 4.2in | 3.9in | ▲ 5000+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 5in | ▲ 1024+0.8 in · +19% |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Massey Ferguson 1024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Massey Ferguson 1024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 174in | — |
| Width | 68.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 63.4in | 111in | ▲ 1024+47.6 in · +75% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 11,025lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Massey Ferguson 1024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Massey Ferguson 1024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Massey Ferguson 1024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Massey Ferguson 1024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Massey Ferguson 1024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Massey Ferguson 1024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5000 | Massey Ferguson 1024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 62nd percentile (69.1 hp)B · 91st percentile (127 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (233 ci)B · 86th percentile (354 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 12th percentile (63.4 in)B · 89th percentile (111 in)
A · 5000B · 1024Median Utility Tractor