Head to head · Utility
Ford 5000 vs New Holland 1725
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland 1725
Utility
- power
- 29 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
FordFord 5000
vs
New HollandNew Holland 1725
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 5000 higher · +40.1 hp (+138%)500069.1 hp
172529 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5000 is in the 62nd percentile; 1725 is in the 21st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5000 higher · +152 ci (+187%)5000233 ci
172581.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5000 is in the 63rd percentile; 1725 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 5000 higher · +1 (+33%)50004
17253
Median Utility Tractor4
5000 is in the 50th percentile; 1725 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1725 higher · +1 (+13%)50008
17259
Median Utility Tractor12
5000 is in the 23rd percentile; 1725 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
5000 (A)1725 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5000 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 5000 | 1725 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5000 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Shibaura | — |
| Power Output | 69.1hp | 29hp | ▲ 5000+40.1 hp · +138% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ 1725+700 RPM · +33% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 5000+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 233ci | 81.2ci | ▲ 5000+152 ci · +187% |
| Bore | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5000 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Sliding gear | Sliding gear with dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5000 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 106in | — |
| Width | 68.1in | 53.9in | ▲ 5000+14.2 in · +26% |
| Height | 63.4in | 87.8in | ▲ 1725+24.4 in · +38% |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 2,206lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5000 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5000 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | 2,000rpm | ▲ 1725+1,000 rpm · +100% |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5000 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 1,920lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5000 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Differential mechanical wet disc | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5000 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5000 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5000 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Two-post fixed ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 62nd percentile (69.1 hp)B · 21st percentile (29 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 63rd percentile (233 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 35th percentile (9)
Width
median 66 inA · 55th percentile (68.1 in)B · 24th percentile (53.9 in)
A · 5000B · 1725Median Utility Tractor