Image not recorded
FordModel A
Ford 1620
Utility
- power
- 27.4 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Ford 1620 vs New Holland 1725
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland 1725
Utility
- power
- 29 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
FordFord 1620
vs
New HollandNew Holland 1725
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1725 higher · +1.6 hp (+6%)162027.4 hp
172529 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1620 is in the 19th percentile; 1725 is in the 21st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied162081.2 ci
172581.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1620 is in the 13th percentile; 1725 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied16203
17253
Median Utility Tractor4
1620 is in the 23rd percentile; 1725 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1620 higher · +27 lb (+1%)16202,233 lb
17252,206 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1620 is in the 14th percentile; 1725 is in the 14th · 5,107 models
1620 (A)1725 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 1620 | 1725 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Shibaura | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | Shibaura | — |
| Power Output | 27.4hp | 29hp | ▲ 1725+1.6 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ 1725+200 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 81.2ci | 81.2ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Sliding gear with dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 106in | ▲ 1620+6 in · +6% |
| Width | 48.4in | 53.9in | ▲ 1725+5.5 in · +11% |
| Height | 84.3in | 87.8in | ▲ 1725+3.5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 2,233lb | 2,206lb | ▲ 1620+27 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Live | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
| Speed 2 | 2,000rpm | 2,000rpm | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,930lb | 1,920lb | ▲ 1620+10 lb · <1% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Wet disc | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 1620 | New Holland 1725 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Two-post fixed ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 19th percentile (27.4 hp)B · 21st percentile (29 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,233 lb)B · 14th percentile (2,206 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 13th percentile (106 in)
A · 1620B · 1725Median Utility Tractor