Head to head · Utility
Ford 5640 vs New Holland TN95VA
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TN95VA
Utility
- power
- 91 hp
- displacement
- 238 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
FordFord 5640
vs
New HollandNew Holland TN95VA
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TN95VA higher · +12.3 hp (+16%)564078.7 hp
TN95VA91 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
5640 is in the 70th percentile; TN95VA is in the 79th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5640 higher · +30 ci (+13%)5640268 ci
TN95VA238 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
5640 is in the 75th percentile; TN95VA is in the 65th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied56404
TN95VA4
Median Utility Tractor4
5640 is in the 50th percentile; TN95VA is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ TN95VA higher · +8 (+100%)56408
TN95VA16
Median Utility Tractor12
5640 is in the 23rd percentile; TN95VA is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
5640 (A)TN95VA (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 5640 | TN95VA | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Not recorded | — |
| Model | Genesis | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 78.7hp | 91hp | ▲ TN95VA+12.3 hp · +16% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TN95VA+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 238ci | ▲ 5640+30 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh | 16x16 Synchro Command Plus | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 162in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 77in | 43.2in | ▲ 5640+33.8 in · +78% |
| Height | 107in | 91.2in | ▲ 5640+15.8 in · +17% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Power Rating | Not recorded | 80hp | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 4,200lb | 3,962lb | ▲ 5640+238 lb · +6% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Mechanical | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 5640 | New Holland TN95VA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post foldable ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 70th percentile (78.7 hp)B · 79th percentile (91 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 65th percentile (238 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Width
median 66 inA · 75th percentile (77 in)B · 7th percentile (43.2 in)
A · 5640B · TN95VAMedian Utility Tractor